Una Revisión teórica sobre la aversión a la inequidad

Autores/as

  • Paulina Guerra Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad Austral, CONICET, Argentina
  • Belén Mesurado Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad Austral, CONICET, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32654/ConCiencia.8-2.5

Palabras clave:

aversión a la inequidad, justicia distributiva, cooperación, desarrollo en la niñez

Resumen

En el presente artículo se realiza una revisión teórica sobre la aversión a la inequidad. Esta es el rechazo que sienten las personas ante distribuciones de recursos injustas, la cual se puede presentar cuando la persona recibe menos de lo que considera apropiado (aversión a la inequidad en desventaja), o cuando recibe más de lo que considera apropiado (aversión a la inequidad en ventaja). Se describen las etapas del proceso que comprende componentes cognitivos, emocionales y conductuales. Se comentan las teorías principales que destacan la función que la aversión a la inequidad cumple en los seres humanos, estas son las teorías sociales y las teorías no sociales. Seguidamente se presentan los desarrollos teóricos y empíricos que dan cuenta del surgimiento temprano de la aversión a la inequidad en la niñez. Por último, se revisan los estudios que describen las bases comportamentales del constructo. Dado el rol que cumple la aversión a la inequidad en el desarrollo y evolución de las conductas cooperativas, y su función como protector de salud mental se considera menester orientar los esfuerzos al desarrollo de intervenciones promotoras de la aversión a la inequidad.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Paulina Guerra, Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad Austral, CONICET, Argentina

    Paulina es psicología (Universidad Nacional de Tucumán) y becaria doctoral del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONCIET), con sede de trabajo en el Instituto de Filosofía de la Universidad Austral. Trabaja en temas de investigación relacionados a la psicología positiva y economía del comportamiento en niños. 

  • Belén Mesurado, Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad Austral, CONICET, Argentina

    Belén es doctora en Psicología (Universidad Nacional de San Luis), es investigadora independiente del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONCIET). Es directora adjunta del Instituto de Filosofía de la Universidad Austral. Trabaja en temas relacionados a la psicología positiva, enfocados en estudios sobre la familia y factores psico-emocionales promotores de la prosocialidad en niños y adolescentes.

Referencias

Adams, S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67(5), 422. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968

André, J.-B., & Baumard, N. (2011). The Evolution of Fairness in a Biological Market. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 65(5), 1447-1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01232.x

Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, D. (2009). Social Image and the 50–50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects. Econometrica, 77(5), 1607-1636. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7384

Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036622

Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. (1981). The Evolution of Cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396

Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology letters, 2, 412–414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509

Baumard, N., André, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002202

Becchetti, L. (2019). Beyond the homo economicus. Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit, 3, 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00216-0

Blake, P., & McAuliffe, K. (2011). “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.006

Blake, P., McAuliffe, K., & Warnaken , F. (2014). The developmental origins of fairness: the knowledge–behavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.003

Blake, P., McAuliffe, K., Corbit, J., Callaghan, T., Barry, O., Bowie, A., Kleutsch, L., Kramer, K., Ross, E., Vongsachang, H., Wrangham, R., & Warneken , F. (2015). The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies. Nature, 528, 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15703

Bondü, R., & Elsner, B. (2015). Justice Sensitivity in Childhood and Adolescence. Social Development, 24(2), 420-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12098

Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Are apes really inequity averse? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 3123–3128. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3693

Brosnan, S. (2011). A hypothesis of the co-evolution of cooperation and responses to inequity. Front. Neurosci, 5, 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00043

Brosnan, S., & de Waal, F. (2014). Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science, 346(6207). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1126/science.1251776

Brosnan, S., Freeman, C., & de Waal , F. (2006). Partner's behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 68(7), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20261

Brosnan, S., Salwiczek, L., & Bshary, R. (2010). The interplay of cognition and cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2699–2710. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0154

Burns, M., & Sommerville, J. (2014). “I pick you”: the impact of fairness and race on infants’ selection of social partners. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00093

Buuunk, B., & VanYperen, N. (1989). Social comparison, equality, and relationship satisfaction: Gender differences over a ten-year period. Social Justice Research, 3(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048064

Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2000). Social preferences: Some simple tests and a new model. In General Economics and Teaching. University Library of Munich.

Chen, K., & Santos, L. (2006). Some Thoughts on the Adaptive Function of Inequity Aversion: An Alternative to Brosnan’s Social Hypothesis. Social Justice Research, 19(2), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0004-x

Chiang, Y.-S. (2010). Self-interested partner selection can lead to the emergence of fairness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(4), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.03.003

Choshen-Hillel, S., Shaw, A., & Caruso, E. (2018). Disadvantaged but not dissatisfied: How agency ameliorates negative reactions to unequal pay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(4), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000181

Cook, K., & Hegtvedt, K. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual review of sociology, 9(1), 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.001245

Corbit , J., McAuliffe, K., Callaghan, T., Blake, P., & Warnaken, F. (2017). Children’s collaboration induces fairness rather than generosity. Cognition, 186, 344-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.006

Damon, W. (1975). Early Conceptions of Positive Justice as Related to the Development of Logical Operations. Child Development, 46(2), 301-312. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/1128122

Dawes, C., Fowler, J., Johnson, T., McElreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446, 794–796. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05651

Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? Journal of Social issues, 31(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x

Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2008). Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.001

Fehr , E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The quarterly journal of economics, 114(3), 817-868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4Get

Gavaux, N., Nilsen, E., Bobocel, R., & Gault, S. (2020). Children's reactions to inequality: Associations with empathy and parental teaching. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 70, 101189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101189

Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2011). The developmental roots of fairness: infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1012-1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01048.x

Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Basic group processes (pp. 235-256). Springer, New York, NY.

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Haley, K., & Fessler, D. (2005). Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 6(3), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002

Holper, L., Burke, C., Fausch, C., Seifritz, E., & Tobler , P. (2018). Inequality signals in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inform social preference models. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(5), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy020

Hook, J., & Cook, T. (1979). Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.429

Houser, D., Montinari, N., & Piovesan, M. (2012). Private and Public Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Evidence from Children’s Behavior. PLoS ONE , 8(e41568), 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041568

Kanngiesser, P., & Warneken , F. (2012). Young Children Consider Merit when Sharing Resources with Others. PloS one, 8(8), e43979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043979

Kienbaum, J., & Mairhofer, S. (2021). Need, effort, or integration? The development of intuitive distributive justice decisions in children, adolescents, and adults. Social Develpment. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12563

Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice, 16, 53-59 . https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847709542675

Lane, I., & Messe, L. (1972). Distribution of insufficient, sufficient, and oversufficient rewards: A clarification of equity theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032222

Leventhal, G. (1980). What Should Be Done with Equity. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2

Leventhal, G., Popp, A., & Sawyer, L. (1973). Equity or Equality in Children's Allocation of Reward to Other Persons? Child Development, 44(4), 753-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127720

Levitt, S., & List, J. (2008). Homo economicus Evolves. Science, 319(5865), 909-910. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1153640

Li, Q., Xu, F., & Wang, L. (2018). Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: The Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity. Front. Psychol, 9, 749. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00749

LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). When Getting Something Good is Bad: Even Three-year-olds React to Inequality. Social Development, 20(1), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00560.x

LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J., & Haidt, J. (2011). When Getting Something Good is Bad: Even Three-year-olds React to InequalityS. Social Development, 20(1), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00560.x

Loewenstein, G., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 57(3), 426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.426

Martin, J., Young, L., & McAuliffe, K. (2019). The psychology of partner choice. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/weqhz.

Massen , J., Van Den Berg, L., Sprujit, B., & Sterck, E. (2012). Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long‐tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology, 74(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.21014

McAuliffe, K. (2013). The Evolution and Development [Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University] https://doi.org/Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/evolution-development-inequity-aversion/docview/1417093156/se-2?accountid=40137

McAuliffe, K., & Dunham, Y. (2017). Fairness overrides group bias in children’s second-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(4), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000244

McAuliffe, K., Blake , P., Steinbeis, N., & Warneken, F. (2017). The developmental foundations of human fairness. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0042. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0042

McAuliffe, K., Blake, P., & Warnaken , F. (2014). Children reject inequity out of spite. Biol. Lett., 10(12), 20140743. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0743

McAuliffe, K., Blake, P., & Warnaken, F. (2020). Costly fairness in children is influenced by who is watching. Developmental Psychology, 56(4), 773–782. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000888

McAuliffe, K., Blake, P., Kim, G., Wrangham, R., & Warnaken Felix. (2013). Social Influences on Inequity Aversion in Children. PloS one, 8(12), e80966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080966

McCrink, K., Bloom, P., & Santos, L. (2010). Children's and adults' judgments of equitable resource distributions. Developmpental Science, 13(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00859.x

Melis, A., Altrichter, K., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Allocation of resources to collaborators and free-riders in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 364-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.08.006

Moore, C. (2009). Fairness in Children's Resource Allocation Depends on the Recipient. Psychological Scince, 20(8), 944-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02378.x

Nichols, S. (2010). Emotions, norms, and the genealogy of fairness. Politics, Philosophy & Economics., 9(3), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X09345478

Oberliessen , L., & Kalenscher, T. (2019). Social and Non-social Mechanisms of Inequity Aversion in Non-human Animals. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 13(133). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00133

Paulus, M. (2015). Children’s inequity aversion depends on culture: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.007

Prétôt, L., Gonzalez, G., & McAuliffe, K. (2020). Children avoid inefficient but fair partners in a cooperative game. Scientific Reports, 10(10511). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65452-9

Qiu, X., Yu, J., Li, T., Cheng, N., & Liqi, Z. (2017). Children’s Inequity Aversion in Procedural Justice Context: A Comparison of Advantageous and Disadvantageous Inequity. Frontiers in psychology (8), 1855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01855

Roma, P., Silberg, A., Ruggiero, A., & Suomi, S. (2006). Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.67

Schmidt, M., & Sommerville, J. (2011). Fairness Expectations and Altruistic Sharing in 15-Month-Old Human Infants. PloS one, 6(10), e23223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023223

Shaw, A. (2016). Fairness: What it isn’t, what it is, and what it might be for. In Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 193-214). Springer, Cham.

Shaw, A., & Olson, K. (2012). Children Discard a Resource to Avoid Inequity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025907

Sheskin, M., Chevallier, C., Lambert, S., & Baumard, N. (2014). Life-history theory explains childhood moral development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(12), 613-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.004

Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R., & Premack, D. (2012). Contents. Psychological Science, 23(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611422072

Smith, C., Blake, P., & Harris, P. (2013). I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them. PLOS ONE, 8(8), 10.1371/annotation/4b9340db-455b-4e0d-86e5-b6783747111f. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059510

Sprecher, S. (2018). Inequity Leads to Distress and a Reduction in Satisfaction: Evidence from a Priming Experiment. Journal of Family Issues, 39(1), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16637098

Sutter, M. (2007). Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.09.001

Tabibnia , G., Satpute, A., & Lieberman , M. (2008). The sunny side of fairness: preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological science, 19(4), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02091.x

Tsoi, L., & McAuliffe, K. (2020). Individual Differences in Theory of Mind Predict Inequity Aversion in Children. Personality and Socia Psychology Bulletin, 46(4), 559-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219867957

van den Bos , K., Lind, A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1997). How Do I Judge My Outcome When I Do Not Know the Outcome of Others? The Psychology of the Fair Process Effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1034-1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034

van den Bos, K., Peters, S., Bobocel, R., & Ybema, J. F. (2006). On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.003

van den Bos, K., Wilke, H., Lind, A., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1493–1503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1493

Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033967

Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Takagishi, H., Shinada, M., Tanida, S., & Cook, K. (2009). The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(28), 11520-11523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900636106

Yu, H., Lu, C., Gao, X., Shen, B., Liu, K., Li, W., Xiao, Y., Yang, B., Zhao, X., Crockett, Molly. J., & Zhou, X. (2022). Explaining Individual Differences in Advantageous Inequity Aversion by Social-Affective Trait Dimensions and Family Environment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211027794

Yu, R., Calder, A., & Mobbs, D. (2014). Overlapping and distinct representations of advantageous and disadvantageous inequality. Human Brain Mapping, 36(7), 3290-3301. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22402

Zhang, Z., & Benozio, A. (2021). Waste Aversion Reduces Inequity Aversion Among Chinese Children. Child Development, 92(6), 2465-2477. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13586

Publicado

29-07-2023

Número

Sección

Artículos de investigación

Cómo citar

Guerra, P., & Mesurado, B. . (2023). Una Revisión teórica sobre la aversión a la inequidad. Revista Iberoamericana ConCiencia, 8(2), 82-104. https://doi.org/10.32654/ConCiencia.8-2.5

PLUMX Metrcis

Artículos similares

111-120 de 166

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.